Only the small secrets need to be protected.
The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity.
- Pao Tongson
@ 04:25 Neisha takes a call...
Joining,__us now, on the phone
from New York is Steve Evans,
who was, I believe, in the building at the time.
Steve what can you tell us
about what happened this morning?
Neisha does not acknowledge
the 'plane' and explosion -
however there is a slight hesitation in her voice
when the image of a plane disappears,
'behind' the image of the North Tower.
@ 04:45 the camera feed changes -
showing both Towers
expelling smoke and flames.
@ 05:03 Neisha speaks over Steve:
It looks like both buildings are on fire.
@ 06:37 Neisha and Jim
resume their discussion:
We are getting reports that a twin engine jet liner
was the aircraft involved.
That hasn't been confirmed.
That is coming from an eye witness...
It seems that both Towers are affected by this.
It could be that the aircraft
went through one
and the debris has affected the other Tower as well...
@ 07:35 the camera feed changes:
The image now includes structures appearing
to be outside the helicopter
providing the video image.
In the centre is a device labeled 'WC5CAM.'
The motion of the 'helicopter' is detected,
however, the image of the Towers
It is impossible to hold a camera
trained on the Towers completely still
from inside a moving helicopter.
This footage is 'fake news.'
@ 07:37 Neisha gives a recap:
If you've just joined us
we're just looking at pictures
of the World Trade Centre in New York
which is ablaze as a result of a plane crash.
A plane flying in low
which went into one of the Towers
possible both of the Towers
because clearly now both of them are on fire.
You can see extensive damage there.
@ 08:32 Neisha says:
There are some reports too, unconfirmed,
that a second plane
might also have crashed into the World Trade Centre.
@ 09:37 Neisha says:
We've got some pictures that have also just come in
of a second plane crash.
Crashing into the other Tower
at World Trade Centre.
You can see a huge explosion there.
So a double plane accident
at the World Trade Centre
in New York this morning
nine o'clock in the morning.
Neisha and Jim Fish prattled on
for more than five minutes
discussing what might have happened -
all the while viewers
had seen the alleged second 'hit -
'live' - five minutes earlier.
Evans states that he was in
the second Tower when it was 'hit.'
Evans could not possibly
have been in the second Tower.
@ 04:25 in the first Blooper
Evans is already on the phone with Neisha
when we see the second 'hit'.
He states at one point in the interview:
The man who's phone it is is asking me
he's evacuating his shop and I have to get off.
Evans also states:
I'm now looking up at this building.
Meaning, he had to be away from the Tower
with a view of the Tower.
Phil Hayton is the presenter
in the video directly above.
We Are Change UK interviewed Hayton
regarding another 'cock-up' - as the British say -
which occurred later on during
Hayton's shift on 9/11.
It is difficult to imagine
that a presenter on the day of 9/11
could possibly forget
his reporting of that day.
My memory is not really my strongest suit,
would be hilarious
if it were not for the millions of lives
lost and destroyed
as a result of the War on Terror
spawned by the fabricated
9/11 terrorist attack.
I suddenly saw a plane
flying into my viewfinder and said,
'Gee its kinda close for that to be here now,'
and then realized what happened.
The alleged plane entered his viewfinder
an instant before the 'hit' and explosion.
Fairbanks had no time to say anything.
Watch the 'hit' one frame at a time.
We see the forward section of the fuselage
'disappear' into the building.
The middle section of the fuselage
and wing tip are still visable
with no deformation of the building
appearing between the fuselage and wing tip.
If this were a real plane
that managed to pierce the building
we would see a gash
between the fuselage and the wing tip
where the forward edge of the wing
penetrated the building.
Meaning this is not a real plane
penetrating the South Tower.
It is a video animation 'overlay.'
You cannot prove a lie.
You're suggesting that there's some kind of
cartoon animation there.
You're suggesting that
the news media was a part of this.
Yes I am.
Professor Reynolds further states:
The two American Airlines flights
for an example though
were not even in
the Bureau of Transportation Statistics database.
Meaning no flight plans were filed.
Meaning they did not fly on 9/11.
Professor Reynolds was interrupted with the question,
Where do you think they are now?
If they did not end up in the Trade Centre?
Changing the focus of attention
away from the fact that
AA flights 11 and 77 did not fly that day.
The question should have been,
'How did you gain access to the
Bureau of Transportation Statistics database?'
Why was the media not interested in checking?
Why didn't the '9/11Truthers' ask Reynolds?
The alleged second hit,
as we have seen,
is a computer animation.
We have seen BBC's Steve Evans
and ABC's Evan Fairbanks
were lying eye witnesses.
View other lying 'eyewitnesses,'
USA Today's Mike Walter on CNN
and Aziz El Hallan on Fox News,